|
TRIUMPH by Tina Peek |
|||
| LINKS: |
||||
| It's
1975. Three young men, who happened to meet by chance earlier that year,
are wrapping up their practice session at the local bowling alley in Mississauga,
Ontario. The name of their band is Triumph. The members of the band are
guitarist/vocalist Rik Emmett, bassist/keyboardist Mike Levine, and drummer/vocalist
Gil Moore. And they are talented beyond belief!! The following year they
findd themselves out of the bowling alley and in the recording studio, releasing
their debut album Triumph in 1976. Their reputation gained them
a deal with independent label Attic Records in barely a year.
Levine co-produced most of the band's earlier works and Gil Moore was
somewhat of a pyrotechnics expert in his own right. His talents were one
of the reasons Triumph's stage shows proved too large for a support act,
not only because of the pyro, but also because of their infamous laser
light shows as well. In fact, Triumph received the influential Performance
Magazine's Innovators of the Year award in 1981, for the unique
way they changed the arena rock landscape.
|
||||
TINA
PEEK: Hi Gil, I'd like to start off by saying congratulations
on Triumph's induction into the Canadian Music Industry's Hall of Fame. |
|
|||
TP: Well I'm
sure that when you were rockin' out on stage in your 20’s, you never
dreamt that thirty years later, the band you helped create would achieve
such high recognition...or did you always have a feeling that this band
was destined for greatness?
|
||||
|
TP:
A far cry from thirty years ago, huh?? GM: The last tour for Gil Moore (laughs)...and I have seen my future!! TP: Is this going to be the first time that you and Mike have been on the same stage, or spoken with Rik Emmet since the band’s break-up in the late 80's? GM: No, we get together with Rik quite a bit. Last Sunday I spent about 3 or 4 hours with him, just having coffee and shooting the breeze. TP: That's good to hear. GM: Yeah, that's been the best thing that's come out of this from my point of view, is just re-establishing relations with Rik. It's been way too long and you know, bands get into these silly fights and then it drags on for years. And I'm embarrassed that we were no exception to the rule. So I'm just happy that it's over and we're building bridges and mending fences and that's the best from my perspective. |
|||
| TP:
And did this come about as a direct result of the Induction...because
of the Induction it put you guys all back on the same page again? GM: Yeah, I guess it triggered it, you know? I've wanted to try and fix things for a lot of years, but like I said, you get entrenched. You get mad. You get entrenched. It's human nature. And nobody wants to go back and open old wounds, so it becomes a difficult situation. But I think, probably, we all felt as bad about it inside, in our own way, and probably are all equally relieved that it's not like that now. You know, Mike and I always have stayed great friends, and I always felt that when the band broke up and that when Rik left and we had our big war with Rik, I felt like, well, it was like losing a brother. So to get him back and have the family re-united as it were, it feels great! And that's more important to me than the Hall Of Fame tribute to be honest with you. Just being able to talk and when we talk about what went on, it's a lot different because we remember the funny stuff, the little nuance that no one knows about, the incident at the hotel, or the incident (starts laughing) backstage. So we have all these old war stories, that if you get the three of us in a room, we'd be laughing so hard, we'll all be crying after 45 minutes of telling stories. You really can't share that with anybody else, so it's fantastic from my perspective anyway, it's just fantastic to have the three of us back talking and laughing and it's great! TP: That's great to hear Gil! So we can expect to see all the band members on stage together, this isn't going to be Canada's version of Van Halen? GM: No, no...you know what? If we ever do the on again/off again Van Halen deal, somebody shoot me, please. I will stake my hand on a stack of Bibles it will never happen again. I've learnt my lesson as far as having wars in bands. It's not worth it. Mike and Rik have both meant too much to me in my life, to ever want to have a fight with either one of them, beyond telling each other to go to hell once or twice (laughs), I mean, get over it, right? No grudges. No grudges ever again. TP: Exactly! Okay, I really want to ask you this...is it true that you haven't played the drums since the last time that Triumph played? GM: Almost true. I haven't, but I played drums on a couple of tracks for Delores O'Riordan when she was here recording her new record and she just gave me a really good arm twist one day... TP: Well I'm glad.... GM: I was like, "Look, you don't want me, I haven't done this for a long time, let me find you somebody, I've got tons of great drummers I could call." "No no no!! I want you to do it!" So that was it, but that was just a couple of days I did that. TP: And what was it like getting back into it again after such a long time? GM: It's like, well, if I was to play drums, it's kinda' like going back to the gym. You don't forget how to do it, you just have to start doing the chin ups and push ups and all that. TP: So it's kind of like riding a bike, once you learn, you never forget... GM: Oh yeah, yeah. It never goes out of your head, it just goes out of your hands and feet, so you gotta' go back and do it. TP: And get the timing back and so on... GM: Exactly. TP: You've mentioned somewhere before that you were a terrible stick twirler, but how would you compare your drumming skills back then, to the skills of such drummers as say, a Lars Ulrich from Metallica or Tommy Lee from Motley Crue, do you think you could show them a thing or two, would they be able to keep up with you or vice versa? GM: You know, I think that a lot of the new guys that have come along, that are a lot younger than those two, are really amazing because I think the instruction they get is a lot better than what we got. Because we didn't really get much, we were really kind of self-taught you know? So if you look at Tommy Lee or Tommy Aldrige or Lars or a lot of these guys, they got what I got. They got to watch John Bonham, or Ian Paice, or Al Jackson and figure out what they were doing and think "Gee I like that" or "I don't like that" or "How do I do that?" And that's how they did it, was kinda' watch. Whereas now they've got really fantastic instructional DVDs, so the new generation of drummers that are coming up, to me I think they're going to blow all the older guys away. TP: You really believe that? GM: Yeah, I do. Yeah, they're going to be way better. And also, they're smarter too. I mean, that's the other thing. All you have to do is watch your own kids, and you see them coming along. And it's amazing how sharp kids are today. Just the average eighteen year old--I'm seeing this with Metalworks Institute, with the students that we have, because a lot of them come right from high school, that's probably the primary source--and the students that I've met, I'm constantly amazed at how much more mature a lot of them are than I was and the kids that I grew up with were when we were at that stage. And they've got so many more resources with the Internet and so on, and so it's phenomenal. If their mind is active and they're motivated, they can become advanced quite quickly. So I think with drums, I think it's a generational thing. Like, I like golf. I watch Tiger Woods and the players that have come along since Tiger and so on. I mean these guys, man, they're on a different level! That's from fifteen years ago. TP: If Triumph were releasing their debut album today, instead of back in 1975, how do you think the band would fare? GM: Well, it's hard to say, because when you look back on bands from the 70's and 80's, they seem very stuck in those era's. And they are, because that was what was happening at the time and so on. But when we started, we were very avant-garde, I don't know if that's the right word, but, every band that comes along is supposed to be ‘the next great thing’, and that's really the journalistic phrase that applies to it. Whatever the style the music happens to be, it's that it's ‘avant-garde’, it's ‘ahead of it's time’, it's ‘cutting edge’, it's ‘where it's going’ it's not where it's been, all that sort of stuff. So I think that when you look in rear-view mirror, you look back and you see bands, they ALL look dated. There isn't one band I can pick from that the work is contemporary. Like AC/DC, I mean, you listen to AC/DC, I love 'em but it sounds incredibly dated, it sounds no different than 1977--whether they're doing it in 2007. But you know, that's as it should be. I mean, who would want an AC/DC that sounded like, these guys, this band that just came through the studio, Alexisonfire, I love these guys. Canadian band, I mean, they're just absolutely rippin'. And when I look at them, it kind of reminds me of what we were going through at the time. I kinda' look at them and go, "I could just see you in the bowling alley, just like Mike and Rik and me. Debating this and debating that, working on these songs and workin' on your style." And nothing much has changed, just the styles of course, I think they've really improved. I like a lot of the newer bands now, the ones that are really good, like Alexisonfire, as a rock band, I really think they're really great! And it completely translates. Like when I listen to their stuff, I don't have any kind of stance of, "Ah well, the older bands, their styles were better, or they were more on top of it or whatever." I say, "No, no, no, this is like a complete evolution!" And this is where hard rock's going. And there's a lot of bands that are doing the same thing, in different styles you know? Metric was here, we mixed their record and I thought some of their music was really, really fascinating. Whereas I felt like Alexisonfire reminded me of Triumph, 25 years later. It's different styles but boy, there's a lot of good stuff out there!! |
||||
| TP:
Yes there is...so do you feel it's easier, or more difficult, for Canadian
bands to make it in the industry than say, their American counterparts,
especially today? GM: I think it's always been a perceived disadvantage to be Canadian, but I don't feel it is. If you think about a lot of the music that's broken in America, it was primarily British, when you go back to when I'll say, the "rock era" started, with the British invasion and so on...and that's really continued, I mean, there's been so many bands from Europe that have exploded in America and you can see that Canadians can get the job done. I mean, look at what some of the women have done, from Celine Dion and Alanis Morissette, to Shania and so on, they can certainly get the job done. I think with rock bands, there's been a perceived wall there, because after The Guess Who, the bands that were coming out, with notable exceptions like say Rush, had a really hard time and it continues to this day, a really hard time breaking into the United States. And we thought from day one, even when we were rehearsing in the bowling alley, our primary objective was, we wanna' get across the border, we wanna' break in the United States. Because we thought at the time it made perfect sense because we knew that if we broke in the States, we would break in Canada. But if we spent our time toiling away in Canada trying to break, then it might be a lot harder to break in America. So we were targeted that way. So when I see managers today, who have been successful with artists, like I read an interview that Terry McBride did a while ago about Sarah McLachlan and his experience in America with her, his mindset about how to make a band break world-wide and it all related to touring and going market by market and building pockets of strength and so on. And I thought, "Gee, that's exactly how we marketed Triumph." |
|
|||
TP: That's
exactly what you guys did? |
||||
|
||||
![]() |
||||