|
|
LET IT
BLEED ETHAN RUSSELL EXHIBITION-OPENING PROUD GALLERY, LONDON 22 MAY 2008 by Alissa Ordabai |
|||
| LINKS:
| ||||
| "Instead
of just recording reality," writes Susan Sontag in her 1974 essay on
photography The Heroism of Vision, "photographs have become
the norm for the way things appear to us, thereby changing the very idea
of reality, and of realism."
No matter how categorical this sententia may sound today, it couldn't be more true of the work of photographer Ethan Russell, whose images over decades have helped shape rock music's visual aesthetics, its myths, its norms, and its affectations--probably more so than work of any other music photographer of his generation. Having worked with The Beatles, The Rolling Stones, The Who, and a plethora
of other legendary rock heroes during the key stages of their careers,
Russell became well-known for taking part in creating what is now universally
accepted as the first postulates of rock's visual symbolism. His natural
ability to see the timeless, the iconic, and the archetypal in his subjects
helped him artfully select privileged aspects of reality to produce powerful
images that sometimes subtly, sometimes directly, but always eloquently
spoke to millions of people of the glamour, the grandeur and the romantic
appeal of rock. Given his indisputably demiurgic, reality-shaping, pathos-tingled
creative approach, the opening of Russell's exhibition at Proud Gallery
in South-West London on May 22 came in as somewhat a surprise, suddenly
revealing a lesser known, more subdued side to his early work. |
||||
|
|
|||
| Showcasing
the best images from Russell's book entitled Let It Bleed, published
by Rhino earlier this year, which contains 420 photographs of The Rolling
Stones Russell took while on tour with them in 1969, the exhibition was
an eye-opening testimony to the early days of rock not only as a musical
genre but as a cultural phenomenon. The atmosphere of experimentation, ambiguity,
and even coyness of the period when rock was still searching for its own
identity, are conveyed in Russell's images with elegance and at times surprisingly
astute insight. As well as helping create and perpetrate the myth of what
was to become the most iconic rock band in the world, Russell's photographs
also candidly reveal the true personalities behind the public personas of
his subjects. Viewed from the modern perspective, these images combine what
is now clearly perceived as vital historical significance with the immediacy
and directness of the best of international photography, regardless of age,
subject-matter, or provenance.
While the book's large format, (15 x 12 inches), allows each image to stand out, seeing the most striking of them on the walls of the gallery, sometimes blown-up into huge prints, framed, each in isolation from another, makes them speak to the viewer in a completely different way. While the book has a feel of a chronicle, the images on the walls convey the urgency and the candour that resonate perfectly with the now. Some of them look completely modern and in the moment, like brilliant colour shots of Brian Jones taken at Cotchford Farm shortly before his death on July 3, 1969. Nothing gives away the tragedy that would unfold at this location just a few days later, and Brian looks vibrantly energetic and full of life. Other shots, like a black-and-white close-up of Keith Richards's face
seen through a haze of cigarette smoke, with his faraway gaze giving off
that distinct vibe of the late ‘60s photographic portraiture, have
the transcendent quality possessed by all iconic images, not too remote
from those of Che or Marilyn. Russell's work, however, is subtler. The
execution method could be simple—a head shot in a close-up—but
the inner essence of his subject is far from one-dimensional. What you
see is a late ‘60s romantic vagabond staring into the unknown with
a kind of expression no one these days dares or knows how to imitate—rock
star or not—so full it is of nonchalant confidence and delicate
poise, as well as mystifying vulnerability. And, if this image does inadvertently
sell you an idea or a lifestyle, the only thing it promises to the viewer
is complete uncertainty awaiting anyone drawn into explorations of the
dark side of creativity. It seduces you just as powerfully as it did all
those 40 years ago. Its main difference from the ideologised images of
political leaders or commercialised portraits of movie stars is that the
identity of the person photographed suddenly ceases to matter here. What
becomes important are subtle gradations of mood, tone, and temper of the
image. Here Russell could have photographed a nobody and the image would
have remained just as compelling. |
||||
|
|
|
|||
| It
is unclear whether Russell knew at the time that he was documenting what
would become classic imagery destined to define the second half of the 20th
century, or if the realisation came to him later. It is an often observed
fact that all photographs have an innate nostalgic quality that can bestow
dignity onto any subject, no matter how mundane, but at this exhibition
the feeling of historical significance was unmissable because Russell's
subjects did indeed go on to become the key figures in the history of modern
culture. Equally unclear is the exact degree of rapport between Russell
and the band at the time, and how much access he was allowed when on tour
with them. But it's certain that even off-stage the Stones were very much
at ease with the presence of his camera, at privileged moments seemingly
unaware of it completely.
A good indicator of a genial relationship between Russell and the band
was the presence of the Stones' ex-bassist Bill Wyman at the show, who
after being asked to be photographed, jokingly told me that it must feel
odd to be on an assignment to photograph a photography exhibition. It
didn't feel that odd to me though, considering that the entire genre of
photography is about engaging in reproduction of reality, even when at
times we end up reproducing a reproduction, which all art forms seem to
engage in these days. The ‘60s, however, was a different era, and
this is what this show demonstrated better than anything else. What it
conveyed was that even when we are not consciously aware of it, that extraordinary
decade continues to provide us with the fundamental ideas, initial prototypes,
and primary examples for everything that now exists in the popular culture,
having all those years ago inspired people to play the first note, utter
the first word, and produce the first image. |
||||
|
|
|||
![]() |
||||